| grace kelly ( @ 2008-10-03 14:25:00 |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|



So you're firmly on the side of Waldass/Chair/Bluck, whatever they're calling it? I call it Chair, but a lot of people call it Waldass. Anyway, my whole issue with Nate and Blair was, and I can't believe I'm about to make a Twilight reference here -- (for those who don't remember - Stella was offered the role of Bella Swan in the Twilight movie and declined, citing her dislike, to put mildly, of the novels and angering some of the fans) -- but Nate is kind of like Edward Cullen in that a lot of people assume that he's soooo dreamy and romantic and it's just not the case. At least not the romantic part, y'know? Most of the time they were together, Nate treated Blair like crap or avoided her and really didn't conceal his lust for Serena, right? And then when they did get back together -- and I'm surprised that none of the feminists really caught this -- but he said he liked her because she was less Blair. It's one thing to go, well, I can see how light and happy someone is as of recently, and that makes them very attractive, but to say you like someone because they're less of who they are just seems pretty superficial to me. And he came off pretty hypocritical when they broke up -- he didn't have any problems with best friend f*cking when he was trying to get into Serena's pants. So, I don't know, I love my writers and castmates dearly, but I always thought Nate was a bit of a douchebag. But, as much as I think Chuck and Blair are equals and he sees that, their relationship is pretty flawed, too, and I'm not sure it's meant for the long run. I'm not deluded, they aren't perfect, they both treat each other like crap.